CAPSTAR CAPITAL LLC

   Nursing Homes Affiliated with CAPSTAR CAPITAL LLC

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that CAPSTAR CAPITAL LLC is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.

NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
VICTORIA GARDENS OF FRISCO Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 118 FRISCO, TX

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

   Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with CAPSTAR CAPITAL LLC

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that CAPSTAR CAPITAL LLC was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Mesa Vista Inn Health Center Most Recent Record: 09/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 144 SAN ANTONIO, TX Ranking: #23 out of 76 (Ranking List)
The Rosewood Retirement Community Most Recent Record: 11/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 64 KILLEEN, TX Ranking: #10 out of 21 (Ranking List)
Copperas Cove Ltc Partners Inc Most Recent Record: 08/01/2014 Role: 5% or more ownership interest	No. of Beds: 123 COPPERAS COVE, TX Ranking: #5 out of 11 (Ranking List)
Enchanted Rock Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Most Recent Record: 05/01/2016 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 FREDERICKSBURG, TX Ranking: #7 out of 9 (Ranking List)
The Homestead of Denison Most Recent Record: 10/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 140 DENISON, TX Ranking: #16 out of 23 (Ranking List)
Legacy West Rehabilitation and Healthcare Most Recent Record: 10/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 148 CORSICANA, TX Ranking: #4 out of 17 (Ranking List)
Hill Country Rehab and Nursing Center Most Recent Record: 09/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 96 COPPERAS COVE, TX Ranking: #8 out of 11 (Ranking List)
The Village at Heritage Oaks Most Recent Record: 12/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 107 CORSICANA, TX Ranking: #3 out of 17 (Ranking List)
Focused Care at Corpus Most Recent Record: 05/01/2016 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 94 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX Ranking: #3 out of 20 (Ranking List)
River Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation Most Recent Record: 09/01/2019 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX Ranking: #4 out of 18 (Ranking List)
TRISUN CARE CENTER-SINTON Most Recent Record: 12/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 59 SINTON, TX
CYPRESS GLEN Most Recent Record: 02/01/2016 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 188 PORT ARTHUR, TX
Coastal Palms Nursing and Rehabilitation Most Recent Record: 11/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 97 PORTLAND, TX Ranking: #15 out of 17 (Ranking List)
Victoria Gardens of Allen Most Recent Record: 05/01/2016 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 ALLEN, TX Ranking: #44 out of 110 (Ranking List)
Harker Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation Most Recent Record: 09/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 199 HARKER HEIGHTS, TX Ranking: #15 out of 22 (Ranking List)
Pflugerville Care Center Most Recent Record: 08/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 111 PFLUGERVILLE, TX Ranking: #47 out of 48 (Ranking List)
Gracy Woods Ii Living Center Most Recent Record: 02/01/2015 Role: 5% or more ownership interest	No. of Beds: 110 AUSTIN, TX Ranking: #11 out of 49 (Ranking List)
Park Place Care Center Most Recent Record: 08/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 116 GEORGETOWN, TX Ranking: #27 out of 34 (Ranking List)
Gracy Woods Nursing Center Most Recent Record: 10/01/2014 Role: 5% or more ownership interest	No. of Beds: 118 AUSTIN, TX Ranking: #49 out of 49 (Ranking List)
LAKE ARTHUR PLACE Most Recent Record: 05/01/2016 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 128 PORT ARTHUR, TX
Vista Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 05/01/2016 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 132 LEWISVILLE, TX Ranking: #64 out of 157 (Ranking List)
Winters Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 05/01/2016 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 132 GARLAND, TX Ranking: #94 out of 122 (Ranking List)
Focused Care at Orange Most Recent Record: 12/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 ORANGE, TX Ranking: #9 out of 17 (Ranking List)
SUNDANCE INN HEALTH CENTER Most Recent Record: 09/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 128 NEW BRAUNFELS, TX
PARK VALLEY INN HEALTH CENTER Most Recent Record: 09/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 78 ROUND ROCK, TX
Focused Care at Summer Place Most Recent Record: 08/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 132 BEAUMONT, TX Ranking: #7 out of 22 (Ranking List)
Los Arcos Del Norte Care Center Most Recent Record: 11/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 124 EL PASO, TX Ranking: #12 out of 24 (Ranking List)
Epic Nursing and Rehabilitation Most Recent Record: 11/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 119 CORSICANA, TX Ranking: #12 out of 16 (Ranking List)
Lakeside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 11/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 118 SAN ANTONIO, TX Ranking: #38 out of 74 (Ranking List)
The Springs Healthcare and Rehabilitation Most Recent Record: 09/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 CEDAR PARK, TX Ranking: #14 out of 43 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

  About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database

Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.

The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:

• 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
• DIRECTOR
• MANAGING EMPLOYEE
• OFFICER
• OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
• PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.